<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Huntsman- Our Man in Beijing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mattschiavenza.com/2009/05/17/huntsman-our-man-in-beijing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mattschiavenza.com/2009/05/17/huntsman-our-man-in-beijing/</link>
	<description>From the Dragon to the Apple- A Sinophile in New York</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:03:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: idris</title>
		<link>http://mattschiavenza.com/2009/05/17/huntsman-our-man-in-beijing/comment-page-1/#comment-66246</link>
		<dc:creator>idris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 19:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattschiavenza.com/?p=546#comment-66246</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad that Jon Huntsman decided to take this post. It&#039;s incredibly important that &quot;Our Man in Beijing&quot; understand China with the cultural competency that Huntsman likely has. I also like Obama&#039;s choice of Huntsman because he seems to be a bit of a pragmatist, or at least willing to strike a middle ground in heated ideological arguments. Obama probably picked him because they think alike...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad that Jon Huntsman decided to take this post. It&#8217;s incredibly important that &#8220;Our Man in Beijing&#8221; understand China with the cultural competency that Huntsman likely has. I also like Obama&#8217;s choice of Huntsman because he seems to be a bit of a pragmatist, or at least willing to strike a middle ground in heated ideological arguments. Obama probably picked him because they think alike&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jascha</title>
		<link>http://mattschiavenza.com/2009/05/17/huntsman-our-man-in-beijing/comment-page-1/#comment-65705</link>
		<dc:creator>Jascha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattschiavenza.com/?p=546#comment-65705</guid>
		<description>I would argue that the ambassador to China may not be that far down the ladder in the political spectrum from Utah governor. It seems like the political clout of governors is more or less dictated by the population of a state, and Utah is fairly sparsely populated. And while the ambassador to China may not be a Cabinet-level position, it is obviously one of great importance, and may be more important in the coming decade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would argue that the ambassador to China may not be that far down the ladder in the political spectrum from Utah governor. It seems like the political clout of governors is more or less dictated by the population of a state, and Utah is fairly sparsely populated. And while the ambassador to China may not be a Cabinet-level position, it is obviously one of great importance, and may be more important in the coming decade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chriswaugh_bj</title>
		<link>http://mattschiavenza.com/2009/05/17/huntsman-our-man-in-beijing/comment-page-1/#comment-65701</link>
		<dc:creator>chriswaugh_bj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattschiavenza.com/?p=546#comment-65701</guid>
		<description>Could it be that they both have longer term plans? I mean, just a couple of random thots:
1: Is Huntsman looking beyond 2012, perhaps? A longer-term strategy?
2: Keep your friends close and your enemies closer. Appointing a potential threat ambassador, thereby bringing him into the fold and taking him out of contention for 2012 perhaps makes Obama&#039;s position a little safer?
3: Are either men chess players? because you sure make them look like they are....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it be that they both have longer term plans? I mean, just a couple of random thots:<br />
1: Is Huntsman looking beyond 2012, perhaps? A longer-term strategy?<br />
2: Keep your friends close and your enemies closer. Appointing a potential threat ambassador, thereby bringing him into the fold and taking him out of contention for 2012 perhaps makes Obama&#8217;s position a little safer?<br />
3: Are either men chess players? because you sure make them look like they are&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

