<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Loan Words and Language Needs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mattschiavenza.com/2008/06/29/loan-words-and-language-needs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mattschiavenza.com/2008/06/29/loan-words-and-language-needs/</link>
	<description>From the Dragon to the Apple- A Sinophile in New York</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:30:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Ross</title>
		<link>http://mattschiavenza.com/2008/06/29/loan-words-and-language-needs/comment-page-1/#comment-21183</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattschiavenza.com/?p=284#comment-21183</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s one of my favorite loaner words: å—¨ as in è¦ä¸è¦å—¨ä¸€ä¸‹ã€€(Wanna get high?)ã€€</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s one of my favorite loaner words: å—¨ as in è¦ä¸è¦å—¨ä¸€ä¸‹ã€€(Wanna get high?)ã€€</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://mattschiavenza.com/2008/06/29/loan-words-and-language-needs/comment-page-1/#comment-21132</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattschiavenza.com/?p=284#comment-21132</guid>
		<description>If you want to get etymological about it, English lacks a 2nd person &lt;em&gt;singular&lt;/em&gt; form.

&quot;You&quot; isn&#039;t even historically nominative, but comes from the accusative/dative form of the 2nd person plural (Old English Ä“ow). The old nominative, ye, is now an archaism. So, too, the original 2nd person singular forms, thou, thee and thy.

The loss of thou etc. seems to have been a consequence of the distinction made between polite and familiar forms on the model of French. &quot;You&quot; would&#039;ve been both polite singular and polite plural and, I expect, familiar plural. Consequently, &quot;you&quot; must&#039;ve been generalised to the detriment of the original singular forms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to get etymological about it, English lacks a 2nd person <em>singular</em> form.</p>
<p>&#8220;You&#8221; isn&#8217;t even historically nominative, but comes from the accusative/dative form of the 2nd person plural (Old English Ä“ow). The old nominative, ye, is now an archaism. So, too, the original 2nd person singular forms, thou, thee and thy.</p>
<p>The loss of thou etc. seems to have been a consequence of the distinction made between polite and familiar forms on the model of French. &#8220;You&#8221; would&#8217;ve been both polite singular and polite plural and, I expect, familiar plural. Consequently, &#8220;you&#8221; must&#8217;ve been generalised to the detriment of the original singular forms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

