Violence in Tibet
The Western media reports today that protests by Buddhist monks in Tibet have turned violent, with at least two reported dead and many more injured. The Chinese sent soldiers into Lhasa, Tibet's capital, and met resistance from many of the local ethnic Tibetans. The New York Times reports:
Violence erupted Friday morning in a busy market area of the Tibetan capital, Lhasa, as Buddhist monks and other ethnic Tibetans brawled with Chinese security forces in clashes that brought unconfirmed reports of multiple deaths. Witnesses say angry Tibetan crowds burned shops, cars, military vehicles and at least one tourist bus.
The chaotic scene was the latest, and most violent, confrontation in a series of protests that began on Monday and now represent a major challenge to the ruling Communist Party as it prepares to play host to the Olympic Games in August. By Saturday morning, Chinese armored vehicles were reportedly patrolling the center of the city.Beijing is facing the most serious and prolonged demonstrations in Tibet since the late 1980s, when it suppressed a rebellion there with lethal force that left scores, and possibly hundreds, of ethnic Tibetans dead. The leadership is clearly alarmed that a wave of negative publicity could disrupt its elaborate plans for the Olympics and its hopes that the games will showcase its rising influence and prosperity rather than domestic turmoil.
The Dalai Lama, the exiled spiritual leader of Tibet, and his supporters around the world, have embraced the protesters in Lhasa. Thousands of Buddhists in neighboring India and Nepal took to the streets Friday in solidarity. Concerned that the protests might spread elsewhere in China, the authorities appeared to be moving the military police into other regions with large Tibetan populations.
The Guardian adds:
About a dozen monks were reportedly detained on Monday, when several hundred from the Sera and Drepung monasteries took to the streets to mark the 49th anniversary of a failed uprising against Beijing. Similar protests took place in the Ganden and Lutsang monasteries in Qinghai (known in Tibetan as Amdo) where hundreds of monks reportedly chanted slogans calling for their exiled leader, the Dalai Lama, to return.
The upsurge in activism comes amid growing frustration with the lack of progress in talks between representatives of the Dalai Lama and Beijing.
I also scanned Xinhua, China's official news agency, for their comment and came across this brief comment:
西è—è‡ªæ²»åŒºè´Ÿè´£äººè¯´ï¼Œè¿‘æ—¥ï¼Œæ‹‰è¨æžå°‘数人进行打ã€ç ¸ã€æŠ¢ã€çƒ§ç ´å活动,扰乱社会秩åºï¼Œå±å®³äººæ°‘ç¾¤ä¼—ç”Ÿå‘½è´¢äº§å®‰å…¨ã€‚æœ‰è¶³å¤Ÿè¯æ®è¯æ˜Žè¿™æ˜¯è¾¾èµ–é›†å›¢æœ‰ç»„ç»‡ã€æœ‰é¢„è°‹ã€ç²¾å¿ƒç–划的,已引起西è—儿—ç¾¤ä¼—çš„å¼ºçƒˆæ„¤æ…¨å’Œä¸¥åŽ‰è°´è´£ã€‚è¥¿è—æœ‰å…³éƒ¨é—¨æ£åœ¨ä¾æ³•采喿œ‰æ•ˆæŽªæ–½äºˆä»¥å¦¥å–„处置。我们完全有能力维护西è—社会稳定,维护西è—儿—群众生命财产安全。æžå°‘æ•°äººç ´å西è—安定和è°çš„图谋ä¸å¾—人心,是注定è¦å¤±è´¥çš„。
According to authorities in the Tibet Autonomous Region, recently a small minority in Lhasa are proceeding to hit, smash, rob, burn, sabotage, and otherwise throw society into disorder, threatening the safety, property, and lives of the masses. There is enough evidence to show that this has all been organized by the Dalai Lama clique, who with premeditation and careful plotting fomented the violent indignation and severe denunciation by the ethnic Tibetans. The department concerned within Tibet is now adopting effective measures to deal with the situation appropriately. We all have the ability to safeguard the stability of the Tibetan society, as well as the life, safety, and property of all ethnic groups within the region. The small minority that destroys the harmonious security of Tibet do not enjoy popular support and are doomed to failure.
(very rough translation by yours truly. Will my band of brilliant commenters please correct any mistakes? If someone provides a better translation I'll post it on the main page.)
As the Olympics approach, China understands that any heavy-handed response to internal dissent will attract condemnation from the international community, while at the same time the government knows it cannot let the already fragile situation in Tibet spiral out of control. These types of stories, I bet, will proliferate in the upcoming months.
UPDATE:
Here's the official translation of the Xinhua piece published in China Daily:
The government of the Tibet Autonomous Region said on Friday there was enough evidence to prove the recent sabotage in Lhasa was "organized, premeditated, and masterminded" by the Dalai Lama clique. The incident, which included beatings, looting, and arson, disrupted the public order and jeopardized lives and property, an official said. The sabotage has aroused the indignation of, and is strongly condemned by, the people of all ethnic groups in Tibet, he said.
March 15th, 2008 - 15:32
I love the way Chinese media is manipulated to the point where they blame the local inhabitants for being oppressed by the Chinese, and yet somehow this whole event is their fault.
They aren’t terrorists, they are angry that you invade their land, and try and population it with your own. Tibetans don’t even have the resources to plot and plan, Buddhism is probably the most peaceful religion in both the eastern and western world, they are just standing up to people who are trying to exterminate them.
Nice work chinese media. -
Someone from the west world
March 16th, 2008 - 00:35
CNN’s footage shows that there were scores of Tibetan mobs attacking and smashing stores in Lhasa, led or joined by some monks (you can see men in Buddhist robes ransacking). It’s true that Buddhism is probably the most peaceful religion (His excellency Dalai Lama has called for restraint and urged Tibetans not to resort to violence), but clearly those were not true Buddhist monks.
March 16th, 2008 - 06:00
If they aren’t terrorists, why are they targeting Han civilians and their businesses?
If they can’t organise, how are they getting so many on the streets ready to fight?
If they’re such good Buddhists, why did I see footage of lamas taking an active role in the violence?
If China is trying to exterminate them, why are there enough of them left to start riots in Lhasa and Xiahe?
March 16th, 2008 - 08:04
Pfeffer,
I think part of the confusion rests from the fact that in Buddhist cultures, most men are expected to adopt the robes for at least a year or two. I remember traveling in western Yunnan and Sichuan and seeing all sorts of characters dressed in Buddhist robes doing un-monk like activities like smoking cigarettes and playing ultra-violent computer games. I’d guess a Western journalist would see a man wearing a Buddhist robe and assume he’s a holy monk rather than just a rank and file Tibetan. Just a tought.
March 17th, 2008 - 08:26
Well said, Chris.
Matt, actually those men you saw were probably Buddhist monks. These days many monks in China (I don’t know about other countries) are kind of dubious, officially they are monks but they are doing some shady business. For example, the head monk of the Shaolin Temple, Shi Yongxin. He is a businessman, not a true monk.
Buddhists who are not monks are called 居士 in Chinese, it is not customary for non-monks to wear the robe.
March 17th, 2008 - 08:46
Wow, Chris Waugh! Don’t stop asking questions, dude. Keep on going… ask all the way back to the 80s, back to 50s… keep going… keep going… maybe you’ll get a few answers.
Why did Han Chinese target Westerners during the Boxer Rebellion? Why don’t the Palestinians love Israel? Why don’t the Basques love Spain? Why did the Plains Indians kill European settlers in the American West? Why do you reflexively use the word “terrorist”? Why don’t you do some homework, bro, and figure out a few basic things about how people and cultures work. Nobody likes to be occupied. Why haven’t the Iraqis showered US troops with roses.
March 17th, 2008 - 16:03
Dawud, nobody likes to be occupied, but I, as a matter of principle, never support violence, especially when it is racially motivated.
March 18th, 2008 - 02:20
Dawud is correct, nobody likes to be occupied. Yet the whole world is, in one way or another, occupied.
March 21st, 2008 - 22:36
Do not talk about occupied! It is not the real reason.
I do not think it is a right thing to ask other think in my way. And I think it is right to ask you to put yourselves in Chinese shoes.
It happened just before Taiwan’s voting. Do you think it is just an accident? Organised?Maybe!
It is not only for human right but also a way to show political.
It is great conspiracy.
Just work for someone, some targets.
And it is the real one we should blame.
March 22nd, 2008 - 10:35
put in my shoes, stuff I’ve been reading recently suggests that the violence was not spontaneous, and may well have been organised. By who, and exactly why, I don’t know.