<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Two Versions of Lust, Caution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mattschiavenza.com/2008/01/07/the-two-versions-of-lust-caution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mattschiavenza.com/2008/01/07/the-two-versions-of-lust-caution/</link>
	<description>From the Dragon to the Apple- A Sinophile in New York</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:30:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connecting News, Commentaries and Blogs at NineReports.com</title>
		<link>http://mattschiavenza.com/2008/01/07/the-two-versions-of-lust-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-3443</link>
		<dc:creator>Connecting News, Commentaries and Blogs at NineReports.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 05:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattschiavenza.com/?p=147#comment-3443</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Related News Stories ...&lt;/strong&gt;

NASA launching Beatles tune into space ...Blogged about at The Two Versions of Lust, Caution - matt schiavenza, WASHINGTON -- The Beatles are about to become radio stars in a whole new way. NASA on Monday will broadcast the Beatl...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Related News Stories &#8230;</strong></p>
<p>NASA launching Beatles tune into space &#8230;Blogged about at The Two Versions of Lust, Caution &#8211; matt schiavenza, WASHINGTON &#8212; The Beatles are about to become radio stars in a whole new way. NASA on Monday will broadcast the Beatl&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chriswaugh_bj</title>
		<link>http://mattschiavenza.com/2008/01/07/the-two-versions-of-lust-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-2739</link>
		<dc:creator>chriswaugh_bj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 06:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattschiavenza.com/?p=147#comment-2739</guid>
		<description>China has no film rating system and the authorities have been resisting implemeting one for years now. For any film to be legally shown in China it has to be suitable for all viewers, from newborns up to nearly dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China has no film rating system and the authorities have been resisting implemeting one for years now. For any film to be legally shown in China it has to be suitable for all viewers, from newborns up to nearly dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt_schiavenza</title>
		<link>http://mattschiavenza.com/2008/01/07/the-two-versions-of-lust-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-2713</link>
		<dc:creator>matt_schiavenza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattschiavenza.com/?p=147#comment-2713</guid>
		<description>Chris- you&#039;re probably right. And seeing Tony Leung&#039;s balls was certainly not necessary, though the camera could have lingered a bit longer on Tang Wei....

/perving</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris- you&#8217;re probably right. And seeing Tony Leung&#8217;s balls was certainly not necessary, though the camera could have lingered a bit longer on Tang Wei&#8230;.</p>
<p>/perving</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt_schiavenza</title>
		<link>http://mattschiavenza.com/2008/01/07/the-two-versions-of-lust-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-2712</link>
		<dc:creator>matt_schiavenza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattschiavenza.com/?p=147#comment-2712</guid>
		<description>Ah that would explain it. Thanks for the clarification!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah that would explain it. Thanks for the clarification!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lu</title>
		<link>http://mattschiavenza.com/2008/01/07/the-two-versions-of-lust-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-2708</link>
		<dc:creator>Lu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 10:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattschiavenza.com/?p=147#comment-2708</guid>
		<description>&quot;So why was the original version of the film banned, rather than restricted, in China?&quot;
Because China, AFAIK, does not have a &#039;restricted&#039; category for movies. It&#039;s either in the cinema for absolutely anyone to see, or it&#039;s not in the cinema (but still for sale on the street).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So why was the original version of the film banned, rather than restricted, in China?&#8221;<br />
Because China, AFAIK, does not have a &#8216;restricted&#8217; category for movies. It&#8217;s either in the cinema for absolutely anyone to see, or it&#8217;s not in the cinema (but still for sale on the street).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chriswaugh_bj</title>
		<link>http://mattschiavenza.com/2008/01/07/the-two-versions-of-lust-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-2701</link>
		<dc:creator>chriswaugh_bj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 05:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattschiavenza.com/?p=147#comment-2701</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it was the nudity. To an extent it was necessary, but I think he went beyond that. Don&#039;t get me wrong, Tang Wei made for some very pleasant watching. I just think he could&#039;ve conveyed the exact same message with less nudity while keeping the sex and the eroticism. I guess I would&#039;ve included more of the foreplay and used less of the cut-straight-to-Tang Wei-and-Tony Leung-bonking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it was the nudity. To an extent it was necessary, but I think he went beyond that. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, Tang Wei made for some very pleasant watching. I just think he could&#8217;ve conveyed the exact same message with less nudity while keeping the sex and the eroticism. I guess I would&#8217;ve included more of the foreplay and used less of the cut-straight-to-Tang Wei-and-Tony Leung-bonking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt_schiavenza</title>
		<link>http://mattschiavenza.com/2008/01/07/the-two-versions-of-lust-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-2664</link>
		<dc:creator>matt_schiavenza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattschiavenza.com/?p=147#comment-2664</guid>
		<description>Ah...have I deleted one of your comments by mistake? Shit. I get so much godddamn spam that I typically go through my comments very quickly, too quickly it seems. I&#039;ll be more careful in the future.

Good point...but what do you see as unnecessarily graphic? The violent nature of their sex was difficult to watch yet established Yee&#039;s dominant-submissive persona, while the nudity just seemed to be collateral to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah&#8230;have I deleted one of your comments by mistake? Shit. I get so much godddamn spam that I typically go through my comments very quickly, too quickly it seems. I&#8217;ll be more careful in the future.</p>
<p>Good point&#8230;but what do you see as unnecessarily graphic? The violent nature of their sex was difficult to watch yet established Yee&#8217;s dominant-submissive persona, while the nudity just seemed to be collateral to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chriswaugh_bj</title>
		<link>http://mattschiavenza.com/2008/01/07/the-two-versions-of-lust-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-2655</link>
		<dc:creator>chriswaugh_bj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 08:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattschiavenza.com/?p=147#comment-2655</guid>
		<description>Hopefully this comment sticks and doesn&#039;t get disappeared, as others have....

You&#039;re partly wrong: The full version is available here if you know where to look. 

You&#039;re right in that the sex scenes do help develop the relationship between Wang and Yee, but I&#039;m not convinced that they were entirely necessary- or at least necessary in their entirety. Lee certainly did not need to be so graphic in exploring their relationship, I don&#039;t think. 

Still, it is an excellent film.

Now, prepare for an inundation of mostly southeast Asian google searchers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully this comment sticks and doesn&#8217;t get disappeared, as others have&#8230;.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re partly wrong: The full version is available here if you know where to look. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re right in that the sex scenes do help develop the relationship between Wang and Yee, but I&#8217;m not convinced that they were entirely necessary- or at least necessary in their entirety. Lee certainly did not need to be so graphic in exploring their relationship, I don&#8217;t think. </p>
<p>Still, it is an excellent film.</p>
<p>Now, prepare for an inundation of mostly southeast Asian google searchers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

