Ang Lee’s Lust, Caution might be the highest-profile Chinese film to be released internationally in years. Yet within China itself, the full version of the film is prohibited due to its explicit sexual content. Instead, Chinese audiences (both in cinemas and via the country’s ubiquitous pirated DVD shops) saw the truncated version with all of the sex scenes edited out. This was the version I saw when a friend bought me the DVD two or so months ago.
I was impressed enough with the film to want to see it in its entirety, even after one of my friends here downplayed the significance of the sex scenes. She said she found them rather gratuitous, and added that she almost would have preferred the censored version. I still wanted to see for myself. Yesterday, on a rainy Saturday afternoon, I finally got my chance.
And….wow. The sex scenes really made a difference. My friend and I both agreed that without the sex, it would be difficult to understand the degree of emotional intensity between Wong Chia Chi and Mr. Yee, the collaborationist official she slept with in order to set him up to be killed. Indeed, the sex served as a synecdoche of their entire relationship. Yee applies his brutal interrogation tactics in the bedroom, while the subservient Wong, despite her burning hatred for him, still cannot avoid letting him worm into her heart.
It is my understanding that Lee did not intend his sex scenes to be purely erotic- and they weren’t. Eroticism, of course, does not require nudity or explicit sex, and can be expressed in the subtlest gestures that would evade even the strictest Chinese censors. Rather, it is during these scenes when his two main characters are stripped bare of not only their clothes but also their facades, allowing them to act upon their basest instincts. Wong Chia Chi’s entire existence is marked by caution- she must not reveal her real identity. Lust, as Lee presents it, is the yin to caution’s yang, and it is during her trysts with Mr. Yee that she achieves a long-awaited release.
Although my overall impression of the film didn’t change (I liked it both times), I felt relieved that I was able to watch it in its entirety. The censored parts, when included, simply illuminated the film’s emotional relationships with a clearer light.
So why was the original version of the film banned, rather than restricted, in China? The historical content in Lust, Caution is entirely consistent with the government-mandated Chinese interpretation, and the film’s fictional university students (one of whom criticized a foreign play as “bourgeois”) could even be seen as nationalist heroes with a Marxist slant. Obviously, its sexual content renders the film unsuitable for children but does the government really expect the sight of Tony Leung’s bottom or Wei Tang’s breasts would somehow foment disharmony and instability among the nation’s adults?
I write this not as a criticism of China per se, and American culture also has a tortured relationship with sex and nudity, at least in comparison with our more libertine European cousins. But I do think it is worth lamenting that an important film concerning their history cannot be shown in its entirety within China.

Comments 7
Hopefully this comment sticks and doesn’t get disappeared, as others have….
You’re partly wrong: The full version is available here if you know where to look.
You’re right in that the sex scenes do help develop the relationship between Wang and Yee, but I’m not convinced that they were entirely necessary- or at least necessary in their entirety. Lee certainly did not need to be so graphic in exploring their relationship, I don’t think.
Still, it is an excellent film.
Now, prepare for an inundation of mostly southeast Asian google searchers.
Posted 07 Jan 2008 at 2:29 pm ¶Ah…have I deleted one of your comments by mistake? Shit. I get so much godddamn spam that I typically go through my comments very quickly, too quickly it seems. I’ll be more careful in the future.
Good point…but what do you see as unnecessarily graphic? The violent nature of their sex was difficult to watch yet established Yee’s dominant-submissive persona, while the nudity just seemed to be collateral to me.
Posted 08 Jan 2008 at 1:55 am ¶Yeah, it was the nudity. To an extent it was necessary, but I think he went beyond that. Don’t get me wrong, Tang Wei made for some very pleasant watching. I just think he could’ve conveyed the exact same message with less nudity while keeping the sex and the eroticism. I guess I would’ve included more of the foreplay and used less of the cut-straight-to-Tang Wei-and-Tony Leung-bonking.
Posted 09 Jan 2008 at 11:07 am ¶“So why was the original version of the film banned, rather than restricted, in China?”
Posted 09 Jan 2008 at 4:04 pm ¶Because China, AFAIK, does not have a ‘restricted’ category for movies. It’s either in the cinema for absolutely anyone to see, or it’s not in the cinema (but still for sale on the street).
Ah that would explain it. Thanks for the clarification!
Posted 10 Jan 2008 at 1:13 am ¶Chris- you’re probably right. And seeing Tony Leung’s balls was certainly not necessary, though the camera could have lingered a bit longer on Tang Wei….
/perving
Posted 10 Jan 2008 at 1:14 am ¶China has no film rating system and the authorities have been resisting implemeting one for years now. For any film to be legally shown in China it has to be suitable for all viewers, from newborns up to nearly dead.
Posted 10 Jan 2008 at 12:27 pm ¶Trackbacks & Pingbacks 1
Related News Stories …
NASA launching Beatles tune into space …Blogged about at The Two Versions of Lust, Caution – matt schiavenza, WASHINGTON — The Beatles are about to become radio stars in a whole new way. NASA on Monday will broadcast the Beatl…
Post a Comment